Product Ideas Portal

The original Instance ID should persist when a report is copied

Many of our clients use the Instance ID in the AMP reports to tie the violations in our reports to tickets in their own internal bug tracking systems (JIRA or otherwise). When reports are copied for regressions and validations, it is no longer possible for them to accurately identify and track violations by their Instance ID, since that changes with each copy.

 

The Instance ID that is generated when a violation is logged MUST persist in an identifiable way. 

For example, a violation that has the ID 123456789 when is is initially logged should become 123456789-a when it is first copied. And each subsequent copy should see the appended alphabetic character changed while the original number remains the same. 123456789-b, 123456789-c, and so on. 

 

This will allow clients to accurately identify and track issues as they pass through the initial audit, validation, and regression stages.

  • Kara VanRoekel
  • Aug 24 2019
  • Deferred to Next Gen
AMP
  • Attach files
  • Admin
    Zahra Safavian commented
    29 Oct, 2019 05:10pm

    Kara,

    There are issues with us implementing this feature because the instance ID is a unique identifier that cannot be the same as an instance in another report. However, we are planning on handling the reporting you are requesting in our Next Generation platform. This is a key facet of the proposed design which will allow us to track issues over time via their fingerprint (which is the concept we are currently using in Alchemy to uniquely identify each violation instance on specific components.